DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006792180-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-02-09

000115888

Contested design: 006792180-0004

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of Registered Community design No 006792180-0004 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 006792180-0004 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Huhtamäki Oyjvia PDF extraction

Finland (FI)

Revontulenkuja 1, 02100 Espoo, Finland

Holder · RCD owner

Seda International Packaging Group SpAvia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Corso Salvatore D'Amato 73, 80022 Arzano Napoli, Italien

Prior art cited (5)

PatentD1

cup lid shown in Figs. 35-39

EP 2 674 370 A1 · European patent publication · disclosed 2013-12-18

PatentD2

cup lid shown in Figs. 45-49

EP 2 674 370 A1 · European patent publication · disclosed 2013-12-18

PatentD3

lid for a container

CN 105857894 B · Chinese patent publication · disclosed 2017-12-05

PatentD4

paperboard cup lid

WO 2016/069755 A1 · WIPO patent publication · disclosed 2016-05-06

PatentD5

beverage container lid

WO 2016/099173 A1 · WIPO patent publication · disclosed 2016-06-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested cup-lid design lacked novelty and individual character over D1-D5 and that key lid features, including grooves and a cross-shaped perforation, were technically driven.
  • The holder replied that aesthetic choices remained in the lid structure and opening, and that the earlier lids differed in their overall appearance.
  • The Division accepted the cited prior disclosures but held that the earlier lids were not identical and, viewed as a whole, produced different overall impressions from the contested design.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000115908

vs SEDA INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING GROUP SPA

2022-02-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000104119

vs Dzhihangir Ibryam

2019-10-17Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000103859

vs PHOENIX IND SA

2019-07-26Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011140

vs GAMMA-A, SIA

2019-02-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011250

vs Guy Vanhoutte

2019-01-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011251

vs Guy Vanhoutte

2019-01-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000102462

vs TURCU GEANI-CRISTIAN

2018-12-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000102465

vs TURCU GEANI-CRISTIAN

2018-12-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098