DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004361376-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-02-14

000103521

Contested design: 004361376-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0043613760001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

WowWee Group Limitvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Energy Plaza, Unit 301-C, 92 Granville Road, Tsim Sha Tsui East Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China

Represented by

A.A. Thornton & Co.

Holder · RCD owner

Shaogang Wang

China (CN)

Room 403, No.22, Lane 491, Chezhanbei RD, HongKou District, Shanghai, People´s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Earlier monkey toy design marketed as 'fingerlings' and compared with the contested design.

London trade show, supported by Twitter and trade-press/blog evidence · disclosed 2017-01-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier Fingerlings monkey toy designs disclosed before the contested RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant's witness statements, online posts, press articles, videos, and shipment evidence.
  • The Division found the evidence sufficient to prove prior disclosure under Article 7, but held the compared designs were not identical because some differences were not immaterial.
  • Given broad design freedom for monkey toys, the shared features created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218