DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005244597-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-02-19

000103399

Contested design: 005244597-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005244597-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

ShenZhen JuXingHui Optoelectronic Co. Ltd.

China (CN)

4F Block 6, Hongxin Industrial Zone, Guanguang Road, Guanlan Town, Longhua New District, Shenzheng City, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Zhongke Chenfei(Shen zhen) technology Industrial Co. Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 3 DongDu Road, XinMu Community, PingHu Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen City, Guang Dong Province 518000, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

mosquito lamp offered for sale on Amazon.de

ASIN B07CHDW534 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-04-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested mosquito lamp design had been disclosed on Amazon.de before the filing date, so it lacked novelty and individual character.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not rebut the Amazon evidence or the alleged similarities between the designs.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de offer with ASIN B07CHDW534 as solid evidence of disclosure before 23/04/2018 under Article 7 CDR.
  • It found some material differences for novelty, so Article 5 failed, but the shared shape, colours and key features created the same overall impression under Article 6.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberGaile SAKALAITE
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268