DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002693952-0014

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-02-25

000011041

Contested design: 002693952-0014

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002693952-0014 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

JMT Jarosław Tabaka

Poland (PL)

ul. Wojska Polskiego 7, 62 300 Września, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa Elzbieta Piatkowska

Elzbieta Piatkowska

Holder · RCD owner

"Awmet" Wolniewicz Spółka Jawnavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Chrzanów Duży nr 8 B, 05-825 Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

profiled fence connector

Community design No 002405795-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-02-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Community design No 002405795-0001, and also alleged bad faith and lack of entitlement by the holder.
  • The holder argued the contested connector remained new and had individual character because of a fringe in the clasp and differences in the holes' size, shape, and placement.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been validly disclosed, but the identified differences were not immaterial so novelty was not destroyed.
  • The Division held the common L-shaped connector features dominated the overall impression, the designer's freedom was not limited, and the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.0125.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258