DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003762830-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-04

000011036

Contested design: 003762830-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003762830-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

INO-ROPE SASvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

1 Rue des Senneurs, 29900 Concarneau, France

Holder · RCD owner

Ropeye OÜvia PDF extraction

EE

Tehnika 1-3, 10149 Tallinn, Estonia

Represented by

Margus Sarap

Prior art cited (2)

National designD1

French design registration No 20165137-001 · National Institute of Industrial Property of France (INPI) bulletin · disclosed 2016-12-02

National designD2

French design registration No 967333-001 · National Institute of Industrial Property of France (INPI) bulletin · disclosed 1997-05-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)(b)Article 7Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant alleged the spacer design was solely dictated by technical function and also lacked novelty and individual character over French designs D1 and D2.
  • Holder replied that aesthetic choices remained in the spacer's shape, thickness, angles and openings, and that the cited slogan was promotional context rather than proof of technical exclusivity.
  • The Division accepted D1 and D2 as disclosed, but found the applicant had not proved all essential features were solely functional and identified substantial differences from the prior designs.
  • Because the contested RCD was neither purely functional nor lacking novelty or individual character, the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELISOVA
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106559

vs COREgravel UK Ltd

2020-10-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000011138

vs HYPERTHERM, INC.

2019-10-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000010803

vs Firma Handlowa „tm" Tomasz Filipiak

2019-07-09Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000010997

vs AGS Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000011035

vs GIGALI Ltd.

2019-03-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000010745

vs LOGLI MASSIMO S.P.A.

2018-09-26Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000011038

vs GIGALI Ltd.

2018-07-26Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000011037

vs GIGALI Ltd.

2018-07-10Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088