DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001394589-0019

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-26

000010745

Contested design: 001394589-0019

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0013945890019 è respinta. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Metalglas Bonomi S.r.l.

Italy (IT)

Via Montini n. 106/A, 25065 Lumezzane (Brescia), Italia

Holder · RCD owner

Logli Massimo S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Chemnitz n. 49/51, 59100 Prato, Italia

Prior art cited (2)

CatalogD1⚠ rejected as evidence

catalog excerpt cited as prior disclosure of a wall hinge and safety-bar fitting

Glass System Technology · Logli Massimo S.p.A.

CatalogD2⚠ rejected as evidence

catalog extract cited as prior disclosure of an earlier wall hinge design

Handbook 2010/11 for Architectural Glass Fitting Design · Pauli+Sohn GmbH

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the contested wall-hinge component lacked novelty and individual character over earlier catalog disclosures.
  • Holder challenged the evidentiary record and argued the hinge could be used in configurations where all features remain visible and the overall impression differs.
  • The Division found the cited prior-art images did not clearly and fully reveal the alleged earlier design, so prior disclosure under Article 7 CDR was not proven.
  • Without proven disclosure of a comparable earlier design, the grounds under Articles 5 and 6 CDR failed and the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJose Antonio GARRIDO OTAOLA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106559

vs COREgravel UK Ltd

2020-10-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000011138

vs HYPERTHERM, INC.

2019-10-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000010803

vs Firma Handlowa „tm" Tomasz Filipiak

2019-07-09Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000010997

vs AGS Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000011035

vs GIGALI Ltd.

2019-03-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000011036

vs GIGALI Ltd.

2019-03-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000011038

vs GIGALI Ltd.

2018-07-26Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088
000011033

vs GIGALI Ltd.

2018-07-10Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)088