DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003496678-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-07

000011158

Contested design: 003496678-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(pl)

Wniosek o stwierdzenie nieważności zostaje podtrzymany. Stwierdza się nieważność zarejestrowanego wzoru wspólnotowego nr 003496678-0002. Właściciel ponosi koszty wnioskodawcy ustalone na kwotę 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Imperial Sp. z o.o. Sp.K

Poland (PL)

Kołobrzeska 8E, 78200 Białogard, Polska

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa Aneta Balwierz-Michalska

Aneta Balwierz-Michalska

Holder · RCD owner

Dariusz Król

Poland (PL)

Kochanowskiego 55, 78-200 Białogard, Polska

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog

PROFI 80 R LED LINE lighting profile disclosed in the applicant's 2014 catalog with technical drawing and product photo

Applicant's 2014 product catalog

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on technical drawings and its 2014 product catalog for the PROFI 80 R LED LINE profile.
  • The holder argued the application was unsupported by reliable evidence, denied that the prior material proved novelty or individual-character defects, and said the contested design was not directly shown in the submitted documents.
  • The Division found the 2014 catalog was a commercial catalog intended for distribution and therefore a sufficient prior public disclosure under Article 7.
  • Comparing the disclosed profile with the contested design, the Division found the same U-shaped cross-section and other matching features, with only immaterial differences, so the design lacked novelty under Article 5.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to bear the applicant's costs of EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberAnna BAKALARZ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
plPolishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268