DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004001790-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-27

000102280

Contested design: 004001790-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 0040017900001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Timetec24

Germany (DE)

Spandauer Straße 180, 14612 Falkensee, Deutschland

Represented by

Amadeos Kochanowski

Holder · RCD owner

EveMotion GmbH

Germany (DE)

Marzahner Chaussee 213, 12681 Berlin, Deutschland

Represented by

LOH Rechtsanwälte

Prior art cited (1)

National design⚠ rejected as evidence

electric scooter design

201630506081.2 · Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China · disclosed 2017-07-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Chinese design filing No. 201630506081.2.
  • The holder argued that a mere Chinese filing did not make the design publicly available before the contested RCD filing and invoked the 12-month grace period in the alternative.
  • The Division held that disclosure under Article 7 must be proven by concrete and objective evidence and that unpublished Chinese file materials are not normally known to the relevant specialized circles.
  • Because the earlier Chinese design was only published on 2017-07-04, after the contested RCD filing, the prior disclosure allegation failed and the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.11

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000113981

vs Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd

2022-04-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000104359

vs Lohia e-mobility GmbH

2020-06-23Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000107759

vs A & F S.r.l.

2020-06-10Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000107760

vs A & F S.r.l.

2020-06-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000103799

vs LT Fördertechnik

2019-11-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000102599

vs Tecnimoem Care, S.L.

2019-10-10Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000103619

vs Airwheel Europe S. A.

2019-09-17Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000011186

vs LA MARE Spółka z o.o.

2019-08-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128