DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002069369-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-29

000102139

Contested design: 002069369-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 002069369-0001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten des Inhabers, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shuangma Plastic Manufacturing lnc.

China (CN)

Shangjin Village,Yanjiang Town, Linhai City, Zhejiang 317000, Volksrepublik China

Holder · RCD owner

Cong Qiang Luvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 143 Area 1, Pengjie Ju, Pengjie Town, Luqiao District Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province, Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Schulte & Schulte

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

food cutting device shown in a YouTube video still

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsu90fTZlkw · YouTube · disclosed 2011-12-20

National designD2

Chinese design for a food cutting device

CN 3604236 D · Chinese design publication · disclosed 2007-01-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(a)Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested food-cutting device was not a single protectable design because its views were inconsistent, and in any event lacked individual character over two earlier disclosures.
  • The holder replied that the views showed the same product from different states and perspectives, and that both cited prior designs differed materially from the contested design.
  • The Division found the registration images consistently depicted one product, including mounted and disassembled views, so Article 3(a) was satisfied.
  • It accepted disclosure of both the YouTube design and the Chinese design, but held the contested product's lid structure, proportions, colours, and container shape created a different overall impression.
  • The application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

31.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010942

vs ROBOT COUPE SNC

2019-02-20Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)318
000128976

vs Dongguan Keewey Electrical Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-08-04Art 25(1)(b)317
000112641

vs CIBERNÉTICA PARA LA PANIFICACIÓN, S.L.

2021-06-22Art 25(1)(b)317
000107860

vs CIBERNÉTICA PARA LA PANIFICACIÓN, S.L.

2020-11-04Art 25(1)(b)317
000127936

vs QuanZhou ZhenSui Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)315
000120870

vs Chuang-Kang Machinery Technology Co., Ltd

2023-04-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)315
000113981

vs Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd

2022-04-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)5
000115888

vs SEDA INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING GROUP SPA

2022-02-09Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)5