DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004697357-0022

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-04-01

000103400

Contested design: 004697357-0022

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004697357-0022 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Duralex International

France (FR)

7, rue du Petit Bois, 45380 La Chapelle Saint Mesmin, France

Represented by

Cabinet @Mark

Holder · RCD owner

Ștefania-Lăcrămioara Bociuvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Sec 1, Str. Făurei Nr. 5, Bl. C9, Sc. C, Ap. 82, Bucharest, Romania

Represented by

Claudia Monica Frisch

Prior art cited (3)

Other⚠ rejected as evidence

Technical drawing dated 06/03/1987 for the Beau Rivage 23.5 cm plate.

Applicant technical drawing · disclosed 1987-03-06

CatalogD1

Beau Rivage collection plate shown in the applicant’s 1999 catalogue.

Duralex 1999 · Duralex 1999 catalogue

CatalogD2

Beau Rivage collection plate shown in the applicant’s 2006 catalogue and again in Les collections 2012.

The glassware catalogue 2006 · The glassware catalogue 2006; Les collections 2012

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on Beau Rivage platter disclosures and asserting market sales since 1987.
  • The holder filed no observations or evidence in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the catalogue evidence as prior disclosure under Article 7, but not the internal technical drawing on its own.
  • Given the designer’s broad freedom and the strong similarity in contours and surface pattern, the contested RCD produced the same overall impression as D2.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs of EUR 750 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078