DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002681353-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-04-18

000010939

Contested design: 002681353-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0026813530001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Erco GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Brockhauser Weg 80-82, 58505 Lüdenscheid, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Akzu Lightsystem Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1529 Guojishizhang Jiaoliuzhongxin, Shahedong Road, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDExhibit 1

lights

RCD No 001280739-0014 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2012-01-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier RCD No 001280739-0014, published before the contested design's filing date.
  • The holder argued the designs differed in the diagonal front elements, holder construction and placement, back groove, and inclination feature, and said designer freedom was limited.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, treated the holder as mainly functional, found sufficient designer freedom, and considered the shared lamp body, inner frame, holder shape, and smooth surface dominant.
  • It concluded the differences did not alter the overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJose Antonio GARRIDO OTAOLA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268