Invalidity · first instance · 2019-05-14
000103522
Contested design: 004354736-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text
The application for declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004354736-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
WowWee Group Limited
Hong Kong (HK)
Energy Plaza, Unit 301-C, 92 Granville Road, Tsim Sha Tsui East, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Shenzhen Contemporary Trading Company
China (CN)
302, No.4, Lane 3, Yongxiang Road, Wuhe Community, Bantian Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen City, People's Republic of China
Represented by
Prior art cited (1)
Fingerlings monkey figure 'Mia' marketed by the applicant as a finger toy monkey.
YouTube review video, London Toy Fair launch, UK sales and shipment records, and supporting UK website articles · disclosed 2017-02-20
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant argued that the contested monkey toy lacked novelty and individual character because at least six earlier Fingerlings monkey designs had been publicly disclosed before the filing date.
- ›The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the witness statements, website extracts, YouTube screenshots, or UK sales and shipment evidence.
- ›The Division found the combined evidence sufficient to prove public disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and compared the contested RCD with the earlier Mia monkey figure.
- ›It held that colour differences did not change the overall impression, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and had to be declared invalid.
Deciding panel
- MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
- MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
- MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000131885 vs Zhenkai Cui | 2026-04-30 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000129622 vs Squar3D Aps | 2026-04-29 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000129681 vs Squar3D Aps | 2026-04-29 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000126976 vs Dohány Kft. | 2026-04-08 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000131547 vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000131507 vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-31 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000130128 vs joboo GmbH | 2026-02-03 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000130086 vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED | 2026-02-02 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |