DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003817386-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-05-20

000101860

Contested design: 003817386-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003817386-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ayano Holland B.V.

Netherlands (NL)

Franse Akker 25, Breda 4824, Netherlands

Holder · RCD owner

Sandbar AP Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

The Glasshouse, Highfields Business Park, Kneesworth, SG8 5JT, United Kingdom

Represented by

Stobbs

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

whisky nosing glass

RCD 000753942-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2008-04-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing the contested whisky glass was identical to earlier RCD D1.
  • Holder argued it had created and sold the design for years and that the contested glass differed clearly from D1 despite limited design freedom.
  • The Division accepted publication of earlier RCD 000753942-0001 in the Community Designs Bulletin as sufficient disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
  • The Division found the designs identical under Article 5 CDR, upheld the application, and ordered the holder to bear EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078