Invalidity · first instance · 2019-06-25
000103220
Contested design: 002275230-0002
Outcome
The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 002275230-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.
CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
BVG Group Ltd
United Kingdom (GB)
Units 5 & 6, Industrial Estate, Brecon, Powys LD3 8LA, United Kingdom
Holder · RCD owner
Forest Garden Limited
United Kingdom (GB)
Units 291 & 296, Hartlebury Trading Estate, Hartlebury, Worcestershire DY10 4JB, United Kingdom
Represented by
Prior art cited (4)
undated page from a book
photograph of product referred to as 'Mercia tall greenhouse 2010'
photograph referred to as 'The shop - bought 4-door set circa 1999'
photograph referred to as '2-DOOR GEORGIAN DOORSET (CIRCA 1999)'
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over D1 to D4 and argued that the design's features were solely dictated by technical function.
- ›The holder disputed disclosure of the cited prior designs, maintained that the RCD was new and had individual character, and denied that its features were exclusively functional.
- ›The Invalidity Division found the applicant had not proved that all essential features were solely technically dictated and had not provided solid, objective evidence of prior disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
- ›The application was rejected in full, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberNatascha GALPERIN
- MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
- MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000105879 vs Bernhard Hirsch | 2020-02-04 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000104699 vs DACHPOL Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością | 2020-01-30 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000104079 vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd. | 2019-12-12 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000104060 vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd. | 2019-12-12 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000104059 vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd. | 2019-12-12 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000106301 vs Sports Partner | 2019-09-27 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000106281 vs Sports Partner | 2019-09-27 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |
| 000106280 vs Sports Partner | 2019-09-27 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 25 | 8 |