Invalidity · first instance · 2019-06-26
000103462
Contested design: 004168102-0002
Outcome
The invalidity application against Registered Community design No 004168102-0002 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the costs incurred by the holder.
Show verbatim operative text(fr)
1. La demande en nullité à l'encontre du dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 004168102-0002 est rejetée. 2. La demanderesse supporte les frais exposés par la titulaire.
CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Zhejiang Luqi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
China (CN)
No. 1 &2 Workshop, No. 209, Juming Road, Sanjia Subdistrict, Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province, République Populaire de Chine
Represented by
Dirk Hanisch
Holder · RCD owner
AVACAvia PDF extraction
France (FR)
50 lotissement le garay, 43120 Monistrol sur Loire, France
Prior art cited (3)
electric scooter (Harley type)
CN303840018S · State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China (SIPO) · disclosed 2016-09-07
electric scooter
CN303265086S · State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China (SIPO) · disclosed 2015-07-01
illegible delivery note
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant argued that its design had been introduced in Europe in March 2017 and that the holder used views from the applicant's Chinese design filings.
- ›It relied on SIPO extracts for earlier Chinese designs D1 and D2, plus an illegible delivery note D3; the holder filed no observations.
- ›The Division accepted D1 and D2 as prior disclosures under Article 7, but found D3 insufficient and treated D1 as unusable for comparison because the images were too poor.
- ›Comparing the contested design with D2, the Division found clear differences in handlebars, mudguards, wheels, seat, mirrors and platform, so the contested design kept individual character and the application was rejected.
Deciding panel
- MemberJessica Norma LEWIS
- MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
- MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frFrench | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000113981 vs Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd | 2022-04-08 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000104359 vs Lohia e-mobility GmbH | 2020-06-23 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000107759 vs A & F S.r.l. | 2020-06-10 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000107760 vs A & F S.r.l. | 2020-06-04 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000103799 vs LT Fördertechnik | 2019-11-04 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000102599 vs Tecnimoem Care, S.L. | 2019-10-10 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000103619 vs Airwheel Europe S. A. | 2019-09-17 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |
| 000011186 vs LA MARE Spółka z o.o. | 2019-08-05 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 12 | 8 |