DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004173987-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-06-26

000104582

Contested design: 004173987-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0041739870003 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Iparlux S.à.r.l.via PDF extraction

LU

4A, rue de l'ouest, 2273 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Holder · RCD owner

BoZarc

Belgium (BE)

Boomsesteenweg 41 bus2, 2630 Aartselaar, Belgium

Prior art cited (1)

Publication

carport design shown in a promotional flyer with pergolas and other building units

habiter.lu flyer, October 2015 · habiter.lu magazine flyer; exhibited in Libramont, Belgium

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier carport design shown in an October 2015 habiter.lu flyer and exhibition materials.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the flyer as sufficient proof of prior disclosure before 31 August 2017 and found Article 7(2) CDR inapplicable.
  • It found the shared structure, proportions, roof shape and gutters dominated the overall impression, while the beam count and small roof-top elements did not create individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberGaile SAKALAITE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258