DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002913012-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-06-28

000104159

Contested design: 002913012-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 0029130120009 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

B&L Bavendiek Lehmann Handelsgesellschaft mbH

Germany (DE)

Rouen Kamp 20, 49439 Steinfeld, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Blackroll AGvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Hauptstr. 17, 8598 Bottighofen, Schweiz

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

older design shown on the holder's website for a dumbbell-like exercise device with two black balls connected by a cylinder

www.blackroll.com · Internet Archive / blackroll.com · disclosed 2014-05-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on D1 disclosed on the holder's own website before the filing date.
  • The holder missed the observation deadline, requested restitutio, and argued that internet problems and a posted extension request prevented a timely substantive response.
  • The Division rejected restitutio because due care and independent proof of timely mailing were not shown, so the holder's late submissions were disregarded.
  • The Internet Archive screenshots established prior disclosure of D1, and the contested design was found identical or at least producing the same overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218