DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004173987-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-03

000104583

Contested design: 004173987-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 0041739870004 is declared invalid; the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0041739870004 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Iparlux S.à.r.l.via PDF extraction

LU

4A, rue de l'ouest, 2273 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Holder · RCD owner

BoZarc

Belgium (BE)

Boomsesteenweg 41 bus2, 2630 Aartselaar, Belgium

Prior art cited (1)

Publication

carport shown in a flyer distributed with the magazine habiter.lu

habiter.lu flyer and exhibition in Libramont, Belgium · disclosed 2015-10-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier carport design disclosed in a 2015 promotional flyer and exhibition.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found the flyer and exhibition evidence sufficiently proved prior disclosure before 31/08/2017 under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Shared structural features dominated the overall impression; the extra roof elements and different beam count were minor despite broad design freedom.
  • The application was upheld because the contested RCD lacked individual character; the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberGaile SAKALAITE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258