DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003034545-0031

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-09

000101459

Contested design: 003034545-0031

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Registered Community design No 003034545-0031 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 003034545-0031 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Eglo Leuchten GmbHvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Heiligkreuz 22, 6136 Pill, Österreich

Represented by

Taylor Wessing

Holder · RCD owner

KARE Design GmbH

Germany (DE)

Zeppelinstr. 16, 85748 Garching-Hochbrück, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

Hängelampen

Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 001410013-0005 · eSearch-Datenbank des Amtes; Blatt für Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster · disclosed 2014-05-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested lighting design lacked novelty and individual character and was composed only of known elements already registered or used before filing.
  • The holder contended the design was new and had individual character, argued designer freedom for lamps was only average, and asked for the invalidity application to be rejected.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of earlier RCD No 001410013-0005 through the Office eSearch extracts and compared the overall impressions from the perspective of the informed user of lamps.
  • It found the differences minor and mainly in colouring, concluded the contested design created no different overall impression, and declared the RCD invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268