DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002459701-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-10

000010832

Contested design: 002459701-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002459701-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mattel, Inc.

United States (US)

333 Continental Boulevard, El Segundo, California 90245-5012, United States of America

Represented by

Wardyński & Partners

Holder · RCD owner

Jieyang Defa Industry Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Deqiao Industry Zone, Xihe Yuecheng, Jiedong, Jieyang, Guangdong 515543, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Prior useD1

holder's “Defa Doll” / “Lucy” doll head

use in trade in Europe

CatalogD2

applicant's “Barbie CEO Sculpture” doll head

Mattel catalogues from Italy, the Netherlands, France and Poland

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on Defa Doll D1 and Barbie CEO Sculpture D2 disclosed before the priority date.
  • The holder denied disclosure of D1, argued limited design freedom for fashion-doll heads, and maintained that the contested head differed from both prior designs.
  • The Division accepted the catalogue evidence for D2 as a valid prior disclosure and found substantial designer freedom apart from the need to resemble a human head.
  • It held that the contested doll's head produced the same overall impression as D2, so the RCD lacked individual character and had to be invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218