DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005254992-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-19

000104939

Contested design: 005254992-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005254992-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen A-unit Electronics Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

4th floor, B building, Qiao Hongsheng Cultural and Creative Garden, Xixiang, Tian Jie Industrial Zone, Baoan District, Shenzhen 518101, People's Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen City Huasheng Electronic Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 307B, Wing Hing Building 168, Sakata Street, Bulong Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, People's Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

National designD1

wireless mirror rod

Chinese design registration No 303710726S · Chinese patent document · disclosed 2016-06-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on eight earlier designs and arguing the contested USB adapter repeated known features.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted D1 as disclosed through a Chinese patent publication dated 15 June 2016, but found the differences prevented a finding of identity under Article 5 CDR.
  • Because design freedom was broad and the remaining differences were minor, D1 created the same overall impression; the RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGaile SAKALAITE
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148