DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000699194-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-31

000000021

Contested design: 000699194-0003

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 0006991940003 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

XXXLutz KG

Austria (AT)

Römerstrasse 39, 4600 Wels, Österreich

Holder · RCD owner

Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

Switzerland (CH)

Sonnenbergstraße 9, 6052 Hergiswil, Schweiz

Prior art cited (1)

National design

Swiss design invoked by the applicant as the priority design and described as a roll-up mat

Swiss Design No. 134 391 · Switzerland

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 8(1), arguing the contested design's essential features were dictated solely by technical function.
  • It said the product was effectively a roll-up drainer rather than a chopping board and relied on Swiss Design No. 134 391 plus a register extract and images.
  • The holder replied that the design resulted from aesthetic choices, stressing the visual effect of the parallel rods and side bands and filing witness, expert, and product examples.
  • The Division found the cited features also reflected aesthetic considerations and that the applicant had not proved all essential features were exclusively function-driven.
  • The invalidity application was therefore rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078