DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000953492-0024

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-08-13

000102259

Contested design: 000953492-0024

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 000953492-0024 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

NBL Europe GmbH

Germany (DE)

Monzastr. 4a, 63225 Langen, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Erwin Müller GmbH

Germany (DE)

Breslauer Str. 34-38, 49808 Lingen (Ems), Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog⚠ rejected as evidence

Wall-mounted soap dispenser from the applicant's bathroom accessories series "Serie 113".

SERIES 113 / article 11321A · NBL product catalog "SERIES 113" and related trade-fair / sales materials

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an allegedly earlier soap dispenser design from its Serie 113 materials.
  • The holder argued the evidence did not prove public disclosure, questioned the reliability and dating of the materials, and disputed that EU specialist circles would have known them.
  • The Division found the catalogues, trade-fair materials, declaration, emails, invoices, and screenshots did not concretely establish when or how the earlier design was made public.
  • Because prior disclosure under Article 7 was not proven, the invalidity grounds under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4, 5 and 6 failed, so the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000109541

vs Guangzhou Qiyue Information Technology Co., Ltd

2020-12-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000109481

vs Guangzhou Qiyue Information Technology Co., Ltd

2020-12-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000109561

vs Guangzhou Qiyue Information Technology Co., Ltd

2020-12-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000109521

vs Guangzhou Qiyue Information Technology Co., Ltd

2020-12-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000109461

vs Guangzhou Qiyue Information Technology Co., Ltd

2020-12-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000105159

vs Ningbo Ontime Imp.&Exp.Co.,Ltd

2019-12-12Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000107040

vs Shenzhen Walikexun Information Technology Co., Ltd.

2019-11-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238
000102499

vs Erwin Müller GmbH

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)238