DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001215412-0018

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-08-22

000104461

Contested design: 001215412-0018

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 0012154120018 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

AMC-Competent HandelsgmbH

Austria (AT)

Seefeldmuehle 297, 5421 Adnet, Österreich

Represented by

Clemens Thiele

Holder · RCD owner

Firma Kurz Natursteine GmbH

Germany (DE)

Werner-von-Siemens-Str. 19, 64625 Bensheim, Deutschland

Prior art cited (3)

CatalogD1⚠ rejected as evidence

RMP Grafmonumenten catalog page showing a split grave stone model

RMP Grafmonumenten catalog

Registered RCDD2

grave stone design

RCD No 001645375-0052 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-12-23

CatalogD3⚠ rejected as evidence

prospect material from the 1990s showing split grave stone models

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought total invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, and argued the base was solely dictated by technical function.
  • The holder disputed the authenticity and disclosure of D1 and D3, denied the design was a complex product, and maintained the contested design was new and had individual character.
  • The Division held D1 and D3 were not proven disclosures, because the undated catalog and prospect materials lacked reliable evidence of dissemination and specific identification.
  • The Division accepted D2 as disclosed, but found the contested design was neither identical to D2 nor lacking individual character, and Article 8(1) did not invalidate the design as a whole.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000105879

vs Bernhard Hirsch

2020-02-04Invalidity application rejected256
000104699

vs DACHPOL Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością

2020-01-30Invalidity application rejected256
000104079

vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd.

2019-12-12Invalidity application rejected256
000104060

vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd.

2019-12-12Invalidity application rejected256
000104059

vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd.

2019-12-12Invalidity application rejected256
000106301

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejected256
000106281

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejected256
000106280

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejected256