DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005301173-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-09-13

000105659

Contested design: 005301173-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; RCD No 005301173-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005301173-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hua Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

298 Xueshi St., Room 306, Yinzhou District, Zhejiang Province, Ningbo Municipality 315000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Ratza & Ratza SRL

Holder · RCD owner

Muchun LIN

China (CN)

No 4 Daxiangkou, Beishe Village, Xinan Town, Denghai District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

National design

projector lamp / projector support

CN702017030415124-0001 / CN304506727S / 2017 3 0415124.0 · State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China · disclosed 2018-02-13

Utility model

projector lamp / projector support

CN 207080915 U / 2017 2 21123493.3 · State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over a Chinese design patent and a Chinese utility model for the same lamp product.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted prior disclosure of the Chinese design patent, found the contested RCD still novel, but held that the shared arbitrary features created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b); the contested RCD was invalidated and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberKelly BENNETT

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.0526.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268