DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002168971-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-09-25

000106359

Contested design: 002168971-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002168971-0003 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Marmi Scala s.r.l

Italy (IT)

Via Prealpi 21, 37023 Stallavena (VR), Italy

Represented by

Magdalena Tarała

Holder · RCD owner

MT LTD. Spółka z ograniczona odpowiedzialnością

Poland (PL)

ul. Grzybowska 87, 00-844 Warszawa, Poland

Represented by

Włodzimierz Januszkiewicz

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

windowsill design shown on the Promotor website

http://www.promotor.tarnow.pl/oferta/category/parapety_z__aglomarmuru-13 · Internet Archive (Wayback Machine) · disclosed 2012-08-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested windowsill design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier designs disclosed online, relying in particular on archived website evidence labelled D1.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, novelty, or individual character.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive screenshot as reliable evidence that D1 was publicly available before filing and found the earlier and contested designs visually identical.
  • The application was upheld because the RCD was not new under Article 5, so the Division did not need to assess the separate Article 6 claim.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258