DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003110733-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-10-02

000104019

Contested design: 003110733-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 0031107330005 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0031107330005 è dichiarato nullo. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dal richiedente, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Federal Signal Vama S.A.U.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Dr. Ferran 7, 08339 Vilassar de Dalt, Barcellona, Spagna

Represented by

Javier Ungria Lopez

Holder · RCD owner

Intav S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Quarto Negroni, 61, 00040 Ariccia (RM), Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

vehicle signalling light design

RCD No 000954482-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2008-07-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and, in the alternative, lack of individual character based on earlier RCD No 000954482-0003 disclosed in 2008.
  • The holder argued the contested light bar differed in the panel, perimeter body, colours, transparency areas, and fixing means, and claimed the sector was crowded and designer freedom limited.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD sufficiently disclosed, rejected the novelty ground because the differences were not irrelevant, but held designer freedom was broad and the shared core features dominated the overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character; the RCD was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268