DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005428505-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-10-02

000106139

Contested design: 005428505-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005428505-0006 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Albatros International GmbH

Germany (DE)

Konrad-Zuse-Str. 3, 54552 Nerdlen, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Hengjia Household Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 512, No 5 Western Building of Lei Zhen Building, Fuming Road, Futian Street, Futian District, Shenzhen 518033, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

‘Kris’ Shell Chair Turquoise Oak by Jadella chair

Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-05-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested chair lacked novelty and at least individual character over earlier chair designs, relying in particular on the Amazon.de listing for the ‘Kris’ chair offered since 17 May 2017.
  • Holder filed no timely defence; its late observations and request for an oral hearing were not admitted.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de printout as sufficient proof of prior disclosure and found broad designer freedom for chairs, so the transparent seat difference did not change the overall impression.
  • The application succeeded on lack of individual character under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6, so novelty and further prior designs were not examined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068