DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002168971-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-10-02

000106399

Contested design: 002168971-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 002168971-0002 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002168971-0002 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Marmi Scala s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Prealpi 21, 37023 Stallavena (VR), Italy

Represented by

Magdalena Tarała

Holder · RCD owner

MT Ltd. Spółka z ograniczona odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Grzybowska 87, 00-844 Warszawa, Poland

Represented by

Włodzimierz Januszkiewicz

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 3

windowsill decorative surface shown on an archived website extract

wymianaokien.eu · Internet Archive / wymianaokien.eu · disclosed 2011-06-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested windowsill design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier internet-disclosed windowsill surfaces and that the rectangular shape was commonplace or technically constrained.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted Annex 3 as a prior web disclosure under Article 7 and treated the contested design's protection as lying mainly in its decorative surface.
  • Minor differences in shade, grain arrangement and rectangular depiction did not alter the very similar overall impression on the informed user.
  • The invalidity application was upheld and the contested RCD was declared invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258