DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003917541-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-10-18

000105400

Contested design: 003917541-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; RCD No 003917541-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003917541-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Northpoint GmbH

Germany (DE)

Klopstockstraße 6, 22765 Hamburg, Germany

Represented by

HKMW Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Ningbo Sunshinelux Lighting Technology Co., Limitedvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 7, XiuFeng Road, GaoQiao Town, YingZhou District, Ningbo 315000, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

lamp design incorporated in 'Hengda 20W spotlights'

ASIN B01LX5KPXQ · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-09-10

Registered RCD

earlier lamp design

RCD No 003328509-0002

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier lamp designs disclosed before the priority date, including Amazon and an earlier RCD.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply and did not contest the alleged disclosures.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de extract for ASIN B01LX5KPXQ as solid evidence that the earlier design was publicly disclosed under Article 7 before priority.
  • Given broad design freedom and only minor differences, the prior lamp and the contested RCD created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.0326.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268