DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005940087-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-10-24

000106859

Contested design: 005940087-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005940087-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

FDS GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Neuer Höltigbaum 36, 22143 Hamburg, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Yong Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

A3106, Building 8, Jiayu Haoyuan, No 698, Jihua Road, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

KUOKEL Airtrack Tumbing Mat Inflatable Gymnastics Air Track Flooring Mat with Electric Air Pump for Gym/Yoga/Training/Kids/Tumbling/Park/Home use

ASIN B07K9Y9DRS · Amazon UK website (amazon.co.uk) · disclosed 2018-11-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosures of an inflatable gymnastics mat.
  • The key cited evidence was an Amazon UK listing for the KUOKEL Airtrack mat, first available on 08/11/2018, before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations, so it did not rebut disclosure or contest the comparison with the prior design.
  • The Division found the Amazon disclosure proven under Article 7(1) CDR and held the contested design identical save for immaterial loop brackets.
  • The application was upheld because the RCD lacked novelty under Article 5 CDR; the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.1121.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
0001081642020-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)21, 0611
000101959

vs Matthew Bembridge

2018-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)21, 0611
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)21, 068
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218