DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003495795-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-10-25

000107200

Contested design: 003495795-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicants' costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003495795-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicants’ costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Japan (JP)

1-1, Minami-Aoyama 2-chome, Minato-Ku, 107-8556 Tokyo, Japan

Represented by

Marius Schneider

Holder · RCD owner

Shanghai Enki Intelligent Electric Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 266 Block G 2F No 1 Building, No 1288 Huateng Road, Huaxin Town, Qingpu District, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

lawnmowers

Community design No 001339592-0001 · Office Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2012-08-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier Honda Community design for robotic lawnmowers.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier registered design had been validly disclosed through publication in the Office Designs Bulletin.
  • Given broad designer freedom, the differences were minor details and the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested RCD was declared invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158