DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006039111-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-11-05

000107240

Contested design: 006039111-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicants’ costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 006039111-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicants’ costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ali Ganjavian Afshar

Spain (ES)

Calle Plátano, 14, 28029 Madrid, Spain

Represented by

Garrigues IP, S.L.P.

Holder · RCD owner

Changsha Jiuduo Electronic Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 1508, Xingdian Yangguangcheng East, Yuelu District, Changsha City, Hunan Province, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

pillow

RCD 003477314-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2016-11-29

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

photographs from websites depicting the 'Ostrich Pillow Go'

websites

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character and for conflict with their earlier RCD 003477314-0001.
  • They relied on the earlier registered design and website photographs of the Ostrich Pillow Go; the holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD through its 29 November 2016 bulletin publication but rejected the website photographs as insufficiently proven.
  • It found the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user despite minor surface differences, so the contested RCD lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068