DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005843554-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-11-22

000107099

Contested design: 005843554-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado nº 0058435540001. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Xpertials, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

C/ de la Creueta, 20P, 46138 Rafelbuñol (Valencia), España

Represented by

Arcade & Asociados

Holder · RCD owner

Ebir Iluminación S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Cl. Perello, 9, P.I. Masía del Juez, 46900 Valencia, España

Represented by

Julia Maldonado Jordán

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogD1

Emin mirror (80X80)

xpertials baño Catálogo/Catalogue 2016; Leroy Merlin España order sheets

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on its earlier Emin mirror design disclosed in a 2016 catalogue and supporting Leroy Merlin order documents.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted that D1 had been disclosed before the contested filing date and found the designs not identical, so the novelty claim failed under Article 5.
  • The Division found the broad design freedom and the shared dominant features created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068