DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004505824-0010

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-01-16

000107739

Contested design: 004505824-0010

CDR

Outcome

Application inadmissible

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity application fee is not refunded.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Erklärung der Nichtigkeit wird als unzulässig zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Gebühr für einen Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird nicht erstattet.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Qiao Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Longhuaqu, Shenzhenshi 518000, Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Wu Zhang

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Sinobry Electronic Ltd

China (CN)

Block 4, Taisong Industrial Park, Dalang Street, LongHua New District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Shenzhen, Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Yu Lin

Legal grounds invoked

Article 98(4)Article 77Article 28(1)Article 30(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity of RCD No 0045058240010 and appeared to rely on Article 25(1)(b).
  • No reply was filed after the Office notified the applicant that the request was in the wrong language and that the chosen employee representative was unacceptable.
  • The Division held the application had to be filed in German and that a non-EEA party had to appoint an acceptable professional representative before the Office.
  • Because neither deficiency was remedied within the set period, the invalidity application was rejected as inadmissible and the fee was not refunded.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000101619

vs caresyntax GmbH

2019-06-17Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)148
000102939

vs Andres Meseguer Lozano

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)148
000010861

vs Adam Hall GmbH

2018-09-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129183

vs Yi Duan

2025-09-16Art 25(1)(b)147
000124156

vs Autoelektronika Maciej Świdnicki

2024-07-02Art 25(1)(b)147
000121322

vs Shenzhen Hongshi Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-02-15Art 25(1)(b)147
000116928

vs Nintendo Co., Ltd.

2022-08-31Art 25(1)(b)147
000116470

vs SENOR TECH CO., LTD.

2022-06-09Art 25(1)(b)147