DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015058143-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-09-16

000129183

Contested design: 015058143-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 015058143-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

MKI Technology LLCvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

Huntington Beach, United States

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Holder · RCD owner

Yi Duan

China (CN)

Chongqing, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

Audio players

EU design No 015038695-0001 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2023-10-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier EU design No 015038695-0001 published on 31 October 2023.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier design but found the contested design created a different overall impression, notably due to colour contrast and two microphones.
  • Because the prior design was neither identical nor produced the same overall impression, the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124156

vs Autoelektronika Maciej Świdnicki

2024-07-02Art 25(1)(b)147
000121322

vs Shenzhen Hongshi Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-02-15Art 25(1)(b)147
000116928

vs Nintendo Co., Ltd.

2022-08-31Art 25(1)(b)147
000116470

vs SENOR TECH CO., LTD.

2022-06-09Art 25(1)(b)147
000115511

vs AIMO MARKING CO., LTD

2021-11-25Art 25(1)(b)147
000107739

vs Shenzhen Sinobry Electronic Ltd

2020-01-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)147
000101619

vs caresyntax GmbH

2019-06-17Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)147
000102939

vs Andres Meseguer Lozano

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)147