DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005844206-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-01-28

000105719

Contested design: 005844206-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 005844206-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jabier Penas Marañonvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Arene 25 3º C Algorta (Bizkaia), 48991 Algorta, Spain

Represented by

Elzaburu, S.L.P.

Holder · RCD owner

Afishal Music Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Unit 2 Midway, Redbourn Road, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, HP2 7BB, United Kingdom

Represented by

Michael Philip Downing

Prior art cited (1)

National design

design for stands or percussion-instrument equipment relied on as the earlier design

United Kingdom national design No 5002179 · United Kingdom designs journal

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier UK design No 5002179, arguing broad designer freedom in stands for percussion instruments.
  • The holder argued the contested RCD differed materially and relied on its own earlier UK priority filing No 6041780 and registration certificate.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier UK design but found the compared designs were not identical and that additional rear panels and other visible differences changed the overall impression.
  • The invalidity grounds under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 5 and 6 CDR failed, so the application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.0117.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)147
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)147
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)147
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)147
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)147
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)147
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)147
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)147