DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006079588-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-02-27

000109121

Contested design: 006079588-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested registered Community design No 006079588-0001 is declared invalid and the holder is ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado nº 006079588-0001. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Federal Signal Vama. S.A.Uvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Dr. Ferrán, 7, 08339 Vilassar de Dalt, Barcelona, España

Represented by

Javier Ungría López

Holder · RCD owner

Osstan Iluminacion, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Pol. Industrial nº 1 de Cabanillas del Campo, c/Francisco de Medina y Mendoza Parcela 7, Naves 20 y 21, 19171 Cabanillas del Campo (Guadalajara), España

Prior art cited (2)

National designD1

puente exterior de luces para vehículos

D0518688-01 · Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas

National designD2

luces de señalización para vehículos

D0529033-01 · Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Spanish designs D1 and D2 for vehicle light bars.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted D1 and D2 as prior disclosures, found the novelty claim under Article 5 unproven, but considered D1 the closest prior design for individual character.
  • Given the shared V-shape, dimensions, colors, and overall configuration, the informed user would receive the same overall impression; the design was therefore invalidated under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268