DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005945094-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-03-11

000108163

Contested design: 005945094-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005945094-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Liping Yangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

403, Honghuige, Caihongju, Majialong, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Chunquan Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Fuxing Group 003, Heyetang Village, Wangling Town, Youxian, Hunan Province, Youxian, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Nan Li

Prior art cited (2)

Utility modelD1

Chinese utility model for a smartphone holder

CN 206704102 U · China utility model publication document · disclosed 2017-12-05

National designD2

Chinese design registration for a smartphone holder

CN 304646965 S · China design registration

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over Chinese utility model D1 and Chinese design registration D2.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted publication of D1 before the filing date as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • It found the contested smartphone holder produced the same overall impression as D1 and therefore lacked individual character under Article 6 CDR.
  • The application was upheld in full, the RCD was invalidated, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148