DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004661361-0019

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-07

000106880

Contested design: 004661361-0019

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 004661361-0019 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Begros Bedarfsgüter Großhandelsgesellschaft für Wohnung und Heim Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftungvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Graf-Zeppelin-Str. 5, 46149 Oberhausen, Deutschland

Represented by

Weber & Sauberschwarz

Holder · RCD owner

Meise Möbel GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

Klosterbauerschafter Str. 27, 32278 Kirchlengern, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

Betten

Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 004070860-0009 · Blatt für Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster · disclosed 2017-07-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on earlier disclosed RCD D1 for beds.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and had individual character, and requested suspension because it had filed an invalidity action against D1.
  • The Division held D1 was validly disclosed by its publication and that any attack on D1's validity was irrelevant to assessing the contested design.
  • Comparing the box-spring bed designs, the Division found only minor differences and the same overall impression, so the application was upheld and the RCD invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068