DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006620571-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-15

000108962

Contested design: 006620571-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 006620571-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Huzhou Miaopin Intelligent Furniture Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.888 Wushiba Road, Tangpu Industrial Park, Anji County, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province 313300, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Longchao Hevia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Building #6 Huayangxicheng, Dipu Town, Anji County, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

chair

Chinese design patent filing No 201930078895.4, publication No CN 305225021 S · China · disclosed 2019-06-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the contested chair design lacked novelty and individual character over an earlier Chinese design patent.
  • To prove disclosure, the applicant filed the Chinese registration certificate with an English translation; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found the earlier design had been made available to the public before the RCD filing date and that the designer's freedom for chairs was broad.
  • Because the designs were almost identical and colour differences carried little weight, the contested RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068