DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006778585-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-15

000109041

Contested design: 006778585-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 006778585-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mpow Technology Co.,Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Flat/RM 605 6/F, Fa Yuen Commercial Building 75-77, Fa Yuen Street Mongkok KL, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China

Represented by

Süle Law Firm

Holder · RCD owner

Hongying Zhang

China (CN)

No.121, One Group, Baiyun Village, Xinshi Township, Qu County, Sichuan, the People's Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

solar lamp or solar light

Community design No 005660271-0001 · Office's designs bulletin · disclosed 2018-09-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity of the contested solar light design for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier Community design, and also invoked Article 25(1)(d) CDR.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been disclosed through publication, rejected the novelty ground because the differences were not immaterial, but held the contested design created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6 CDR, the RCD was invalidated, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268