DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004068112-0020

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-16

000107139

Contested design: 004068112-0020

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid; the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004068112-0020 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Semir Raad Marokivia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

str. Faurei nr. 5, bloc C9, sc. C, ap. 82, Bucuresti, Romania

Represented by

Frisch & Partners SRL

Crina Frisch

Holder · RCD owner

SC Gold Glass SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

SC GOLD GLASS SRL Str. Lt. Col. Dumitru Papazoglu, Nr. 60, Et. 2, Ap. 10, Sector 3, 031203 Bucharest, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

RCD No 0038506010030 · Office bulletin · disclosed 2017-04-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 0038506010030.
  • The holder argued the product had been sold for years and challenged the validity of the applicant's earlier design, submitting catalogues and invoices.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been disclosed by publication before the contested filing date and treated the holder's attack on it as irrelevant here.
  • Because the compared designs were identical in all perceivable features, the contested RCD lacked novelty and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078