DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003304021-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-27

000105399

Contested design: 003304021-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0033040210001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Piotr Siwekvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Bysewska 30, 80298 Gdańsk, Poland

Represented by

Wojciech Gierszewski

Holder · RCD owner

Domator24.com Pawel Nowak

Poland (PL)

ul. Dekoracyjna 8, 65-155 Zielona Góra, Poland

Prior art cited (4)

Web disclosureD1

DXRacer Formula Series DOH/FD01/NR Office Chair

amazon.com

Web disclosureD2

DXRacer FE08NB PC Gaming Chair

gameaccessoriesguide.com · disclosed 2014-11-09

Web disclosureD3

DXRacer FH08/NO Black Orange Racing Bucket Seat

amazon.com

Web disclosureD4

Merax High-Back Ergonomic Pu Leather Office Chair

amazon.com

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on four earlier gaming-chair disclosures from Amazon and GameAccessoriesGuide.
  • The holder disputed disclosure of several web exhibits and argued that differences in colour arrangement, cushions, stitching, and visible views produced a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D2 by 9 November 2014 and found that its practically identical chair shape and arrangement of features outweighed ornamentation differences.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character over D2, so the Division did not need to examine novelty or the other cited designs further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068