DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001945197-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-05-04

000105980

Contested design: 001945197-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0019451970001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

TAGO Przedsiębiorstwo Przemysłu Cukierniczego Tadeusz Gołębiewski

Poland (PL)

Ciemne ul. Wołomińska 125, 05-250 Radzymin, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Dr Gerard Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

ul. Poznańska 129/133, 05-850 Ożarów Mazowiecki, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

chocolate-covered wafer bar

Prince polo wafer · YouTube; www.auchandirect.pl; www.icelandnews.is · disclosed 2011-03-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested wafer-bar RCD lacked novelty and individual character over earlier designs, especially the 'Prince polo wafer' disclosed online and on YouTube before filing.
  • Holder disputed disclosure, arguing the webpages and video showed only part of the product, lacked reliable dating, and did not prove a consistent earlier appearance.
  • The Division accepted the combined web evidence and later clarifying photos, found broad designer freedom for wafer bars, and treated the extra visible layer as insufficient to alter the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character; the RCD was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126096

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018