DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003316058-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-05-04

000109202

Contested design: 003316058-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0033160580001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Elcotec Veranstaltungstechnik UG (haftungsbeschränkt)via PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Hansaring 138-142, 48268 Greven, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Xingyueda Technology Co., LTDvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

3rd Floor, Building E, Longda Industrial Zone, Liaokeng Village, Shiyan St. Bao’an, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

José Izquierdo Faces

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

LED lamp

ASIN B0168LVUSK · www.amazon.com sales platform · disclosed 2015-10-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested LED lighting design lacked novelty and individual character because identical products had been sold in the EU before the 22 July 2016 filing date.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon listing for a Lixada LED lamp, identified by ASIN B0168LVUSK and shown as available from 6 October 2015; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon extract as solid evidence of prior disclosure under Article 7 and found the compared designs identical, with any fixation detail and the LIXADA mark immaterial.
  • The application succeeded under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 5, so the RCD was invalidated without examining individual character further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268