DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004517001-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-05-06

000109502

Contested design: 004517001-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004517001-0002 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Astro Lighting Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

The Astro Building, Midas, River Way, Harlow, Essex CM20 2GJ, United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

Nan Zhengvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.23, Second Block, Gongbei Village, Gaopu Town, Puning, Guangdong, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Süle Law Firm

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

wall lamp

RCD No 002423962-0004 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-04-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing lack of novelty and individual character over several earlier designs, especially its earlier RCD No 002423962-0004.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted publication of the earlier RCD in the Community Designs Bulletin as prior disclosure and found broad designer freedom for the lamp's non-functional visual features.
  • The shared overall impression outweighed the differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid; other grounds and prior designs were not examined further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268