DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006952735-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-05-07

000109701

Contested design: 006952735-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

La demande en nullité est accueillie. Le dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré no 006952735-0001 est déclaré nul. La titulaire supporte les frais de la demanderesse, fixés à 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Huanqun Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

no 3, Lane 17 Zhongzhou, Jianyang Village, Lianxia Town, Chenghai District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, République populaire de Chine

Represented by

José Izquierdo Faces

Holder · RCD owner

Guilan Chen

China (CN)

no 2, Lane 2, Magongqian Shuimei, Chenghua sous-dist. Ximen, Chenghai Dist., Shantou, Guangdong, République populaire de Chine

Represented by

Intellectual Property Law Law Firm

Sławomir Krzysztof Nowicki

Prior art cited (1)

National designAnnexe 1

humanoid toy robot design

ZL 2017 3 0506072.8 · Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration database · disclosed 2017-11-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over her earlier Chinese design ZL 2017 3 0506072.8 for a toy robot.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted publication of the earlier Chinese design on 21 November 2017 as sufficient prior disclosure under Article 7.
  • It found the two humanoid toy robot designs created the same overall impression, with only superficial colour and ornament differences, and declared the RCD invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN Bavel
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218