DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003047885-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-05-20

000108461

Contested design: 003047885-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0030478850001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hauck GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Postfach 11 60, 96238 Sonnefeld, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Land Leopard (Xiamen) Industrial Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 202 No 28 Xiang Yue Rd, Torch Industrial Area, Xiang An District, Xiamen 361101, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Iridium IP

Prior art cited (1)

National design

baby carriage

Chinese design document No 201530087665.6 · China · disclosed 2015-09-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier Chinese design document No 201530087665.6.
  • Holder accepted disclosure of the earlier design but argued the contested baby carriage differed in seat position, chassis, awning, basket and wheels.
  • The Division found the earlier design was validly disclosed before the RCD filing date and that designer freedom for baby carriages was broad.
  • Despite similarities typical of light baby carriages, the identified design differences created a different overall impression on the informed user, so the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.12

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128826

vs Shenzhen Lireder Industrial Co., Ltd.

2025-08-18Art 25(1)(b)127
000120579

vs Lohia e-mobility GmbH

2025-03-12Art 25(1)(b)127
000120480

vs VER PLAST S.r.l.

2023-11-13Art 25(1)(b)127
000120410

vs VER PLAST S.r.l.

2023-11-10Art 25(1)(b)127
000120409

vs VER PLAST S.r.l.

2023-11-10Art 25(1)(b)127
000120158

vs elobau GmbH & Co. KG

2023-11-10Art 25(1)(b)127
000118721

vs HANGZHOU CHIC INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

2023-10-16Art 25(1)(b)127
000118758

vs HANGZHOU CHIC INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

2023-10-16Art 25(1)(b)127