DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005652468-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-06-16

000107241

Contested design: 005652468-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005652468-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

MAR 2000 OOD

Bulgaria (BG)

JK ‘Nadejda’l, 5, Stefanson str., 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

BUREAU IGNATOV & SON

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

LEGO toy set No 60043 'Prisoner Transporter'

ASIN B00F3B38Y6 · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2013-09-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on prior disclosure of LEGO toy set No 60043 'Prisoner Transporter' before the contested filing date.
  • Holder disputed the disclosure evidence as untranslated and unreliable internet material, argued toy-box design freedom was limited, and filed no supporting evidence.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon and corroborating materials as reliable and found the earlier design had been made available to the public by 10 September 2013 under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Comparing the contested design with the earlier design, the Division found all contested features present in the prior design, so the RCD lacked novelty and had to be declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218